WebGL Lesson 1 – A triangle and a square

<< Lesson 0Lesson 2 >>

Welcome to my first WebGL tutorial! This first lesson is based on number 2 in the NeHe OpenGL tutorials, which are a popular way of learning 3D graphics for game development. It shows you how to draw a triangle and a square in a web page. Maybe that’s not terribly exciting in itself, but it’s a great introduction to the foundations of WebGL; if you understand how this works, the rest should be pretty simple…

Here’s what the lesson looks like when run on a browser that supports WebGL:
A static picture of this lesson's results

Click here and you’ll see the live WebGL version, if you’ve got a browser that supports it; here’s how to get one if you don’t.

More on how it all works below…

A quick warning: These lessons are targeted at people with a reasonable amount of programming knowledge, but no real experience in 3D graphics; the aim is to get you up and running, with a good understanding of what’s going on in the code, so that you can start producing your own 3D Web pages as quickly as possible. I’m writing these as I learn WebGL myself, so there may well be (and probably are) errors; use at your own risk. However, I’m fixing bugs and correcting misconceptions as I hear about them, so if you see anything broken then please let me know in the comments.

There are two ways you can get the code for this example; just “View Source” while you’re looking at the live version, or if you use GitHub, you can clone it (and future lessons) from the repository there.  Either way, once you have the code, load it up in your favourite text editor and take a look.  It’s pretty daunting at first glance, even if you’ve got a nodding acquaintance with, say, OpenGL.  Right at the start we’re defining a couple of shaders, which are generally regarded as relatively advanced… but don’t despair, it’s actually much simpler than it looks.

Like many programs, this WebGL page starts off by defining a bunch of lower-level functions which are used by the high-level code at the bottom.  In order to explain it, I’ll start at the bottom and work my way up, so if you’re following through in the code, jump down to the bottom.

You’ll see the following HTML code:

<body onload="webGLStart();">
  <a href="http://learningwebgl.com/blog/?p=28">&lt;&lt; Back to Lesson 1</a><br />

  <canvas id="lesson01-canvas" style="border: none;" width="500" height="500"></canvas>

  <a href="http://learningwebgl.com/blog/?p=28">&lt;&lt; Back to Lesson 1</a><br />

This is the complete body of the page — everything else is in JavaScript (though if you got the code using “View source” you’ll see some extra junk needed by my website analytics, which you can ignore). Obviously we could put more normal HTML inside the <body> tags and build our WebGL image into a normal web page, but for this simple demo we’ve just got the links back to this blog post, and the <canvas> tag, which is where the 3D graphics live.   Canvases are new for HTML5 — they’re how it supports new kinds of JavaScript-drawn elements in web pages, both 2D and (through WebGL) 3D.  We don’t specify anything more than the simple layout properties of the canvas in its tag, and instead leave all of the WebGL setup code to a JavaScript function called webGLStart, which you can see is called once the page is loaded.

Let’s scroll up to that function now and take a look at it:

  function webGLStart() {
    var canvas = document.getElementById("lesson01-canvas");

    gl.clearColor(0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);


It calls functions to initialise WebGL and the shaders that I mentioned earlier, passing into the former the canvas element on which we want to draw our 3D stuff, and then it initialises some buffers using initBuffers; buffers are things that hold the details of the the triangle and the square that we’re going to be drawing — we’ll talk more about those in a moment. Next, it does some basic WebGL setup, saying that when we clear the canvas we should make it black, and that we should do depth testing (so that things drawn behind other things should be hidden by the things in front of them). These steps are implemented by calls to methods on a gl object — we’ll see how that’s initialised later. Finally, it calls the function drawScene; this (as you’d expect from the name) draws the triangle and the square, using the buffers.

We’ll come back to initGL and initShaders later on, as they’re important in understanding how the page works, but first, let’s take a look at initBuffers and drawScene.

initBuffers first; taking it step by step:

  var triangleVertexPositionBuffer;
  var squareVertexPositionBuffer;

We declare two global variables to hold the buffers. (In any real-world WebGL page you wouldn’t have a separate global variable for each object in the scene, but we’re using them here to keep things simple, as we’re just getting started.)


  function initBuffers() {
    triangleVertexPositionBuffer = gl.createBuffer();

We create a buffer for the triangle’s vertex positions. Vertices (don’t you just love irregular plurals?) are the points in 3D space that define the shapes we’re drawing. For our triangle, we will have three of them (which we’ll set up in a minute). This buffer is actually a bit of memory on the graphics card; by putting the vertex positions on the card once in our initialisation code and then, when we come to draw the scene, essentially just telling WebGL to “draw those things I told you about earlier”, we can make our code really efficient, especially once we start animating the scene and want to draw the object tens of times every second to make it move. Of course, when it’s just three vertex positions as in this case, there’s not too much cost to pushing them up to the graphics card — but when you’re dealing with large models with tens of thousands of vertices, it can be a real advantage to do things this way. Next:

    gl.bindBuffer(gl.ARRAY_BUFFER, triangleVertexPositionBuffer);

This line tells WebGL that any following operations that act on buffers should use the one we specify. There’s always this concept of a “current array buffer”, and functions act on that rather than letting you specify which array buffer you want to work with. Odd, but I’m sure there a good performance reasons behind it…

    var vertices = [
         0.0,  1.0,  0.0,
        -1.0, -1.0,  0.0,
         1.0, -1.0,  0.0

Next, we define our vertex positions as a JavaScript list. You can see that they’re at the points of an isosceles triangle with its centre at (0, 0, 0).

    gl.bufferData(gl.ARRAY_BUFFER, new Float32Array(vertices), gl.STATIC_DRAW);

Now, we create a Float32Array object based on our JavaScript list, and tell WebGL to use it to fill the current buffer, which is of course our triangleVertexPositionBuffer. We’ll talk more about Float32Arrays in a future lesson, but for now all you need to know is that they’re a way of turning a JavaScript list into something we can pass over to WebGL for filling its buffers.

    triangleVertexPositionBuffer.itemSize = 3;
    triangleVertexPositionBuffer.numItems = 3;

The last thing we do with the buffer is to set two new properties on it. These are not something that’s built into WebGL, but they will be very useful later on. One nice thing (some would say, bad thing) about JavaScript is that an object doesn’t have to explicitly support a particular property for you to set it on it. So although the buffer object didn’t previously have itemSize and numItems properties, now it does. We’re using them to say that this 9-element buffer actually represents three separate vertex positions (numItems), each of which is made up of three numbers (itemSize).

Now we’ve completely set up the buffer for the triangle, so it’s on to the square:

    squareVertexPositionBuffer = gl.createBuffer();
    gl.bindBuffer(gl.ARRAY_BUFFER, squareVertexPositionBuffer);
    vertices = [
         1.0,  1.0,  0.0,
        -1.0,  1.0,  0.0,
         1.0, -1.0,  0.0,
        -1.0, -1.0,  0.0
    gl.bufferData(gl.ARRAY_BUFFER, new Float32Array(vertices), gl.STATIC_DRAW);
    squareVertexPositionBuffer.itemSize = 3;
    squareVertexPositionBuffer.numItems = 4;

All of that should be pretty obvious — the square has four vertex positions rather than 3, and so the array is bigger and the numItems is different.

OK, so that was what we needed to do to push our two objects’ vertex positions up to the graphics card. Now let’s look at drawScene, which is where we use those buffers to actually draw the image we’re seeing. Taking it step-by-step:

  function drawScene() {
    gl.viewport(0, 0, gl.viewportWidth, gl.viewportHeight);

The first step is to tell WebGL a little bit about the size of the canvas using the viewport function; we’ll come back to why that’s important in a (much!) later lesson; for now, you just need to know that the function needs calling with the size of the canvas before you start drawing. Next, we clear the canvas in preparation for drawing on it:

    gl.clear(gl.COLOR_BUFFER_BIT | gl.DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT);

…and then:

    mat4.perspective(45, gl.viewportWidth / gl.viewportHeight, 0.1, 100.0, pMatrix);

Here we’re setting up the perspective with which we want to view the scene.  By default, WebGL will draw things that are close by the same size as things that are far away (a style of 3D known as orthographic projection).  In order to make things that are further away look smaller, we need to tell it a little about the perspective we’re using.  For this scene, we’re saying that our (vertical) field of view is 45°, we’re telling it about the width-to-height ratio of our canvas, and saying that we don’t want to see things that are closer than 0.1 units to our viewpoint, and that we don’t want to see things that are further away than 100 units.

As you can see, this perspective stuff is using a function from a module called mat4, and involves an intriguingly-named variable called pMatrix. More about these later; hopefully for now it is clear how to use them without needing to know the details.

Now that we have our perspective set up, we can move on to drawing some stuff:


The first step is to “move” to the centre of the 3D scene.  In OpenGL, when you’re drawing a scene, you tell it to draw each thing you draw at a “current” position with a “current” rotation — so, for example, you say “move 20 units forward, rotate 32 degrees, then draw the robot”, the last bit being some complex set of “move this much, rotate a bit, draw that” instructions in itself.  This is useful because you can encapsulate the “draw the robot” code in one function, and then easily move said robot around just by changing the move/rotate stuff you do before calling that function.

The current position and current rotation are both held in a matrix; as you probably learned at school, matrices can represent translations (moves from place to place), rotations, and other geometrical transformations.  For reasons I won’t go into right now, you can use a single 4×4 matrix (not 3×3) to represent any number of transformations in 3D space; you start with the identity matrix — that is, the matrix that represents a transformation that does nothing at all — then multiply it by the matrix that represents your first transformation, then by the one that represents your second transformation, and so on.   The combined matrix represents all of your transformations in one. The matrix we use to represent this current move/rotate state is called the model-view matrix, and by now you have probably worked out that the variable mvMatrix holds our model-view matrix, and the mat4.identity function that we just called sets it to the identity matrix so that we’re ready to start multiplying translations and rotations into it.  Or, in other words, it’s moved us to an origin point from which we can move to start drawing our 3D world.

Sharp-eyed readers will have noticed that at the start of this discussion of matrices I said “in OpenGL”, not “in WebGL”.  This is because WebGL doesn’t have this stuff built in to the graphics library. Instead, we use a third-party matrix library — Brandon Jones’s excellent glMatrix — plus some nifty WebGL tricks to get the same effect. More about that niftiness later.

Right, let’s move on to the code that draws the triangle on the left-hand side of our canvas.

    mat4.translate(mvMatrix, [-1.5, 0.0, -7.0]);

Having moved to the centre of our 3D space with by setting mvMatrix to the identity matrix, we start the triangle  by moving 1.5 units to the left (that is, in the negative sense along the X axis), and seven units into the scene (that is, away from the viewer; the negative sense along the Z axis).  (mat4.translate, as you might guess, means “multiply the given matrix by a translation matrix with the following parameters”.)

The next step is to actually start drawing something!

    gl.bindBuffer(gl.ARRAY_BUFFER, triangleVertexPositionBuffer);
    gl.vertexAttribPointer(shaderProgram.vertexPositionAttribute, triangleVertexPositionBuffer.itemSize, gl.FLOAT, false, 0, 0);

So, you remember that in order to use one of our buffers, we call gl.bindBuffer to specify a current buffer, and then call the code that operates on it. Here we’re selecting our triangleVertexPositionBuffer, then telling WebGL that the values in it should be used for vertex positions. I’ll explain a little more about how that works later; for now, you can see that we’re using the itemSize property we set on the buffer to tell WebGL that each item in the buffer is three numbers long.

Next, we have:


This tells WebGL to take account of our current model-view matrix (and also the projection matrix, about which more later).   This is required because all of this matrix stuff isn’t built in to WebGL.  The way to look at it is that you can do all of the moving around by changing the mvMatrix variable you want, but this all happens in JavaScript’s private space.  setMatrixUniforms, a function that’s defined further up in this file, moves it over to the graphics card.

Once this is done, WebGL has an array of numbers that it knows should be treated as vertex positions, and it knows about our matrices.   The next step tells it what to do with them:

    gl.drawArrays(gl.TRIANGLES, 0, triangleVertexPositionBuffer.numItems);

Or, put another way, “draw the array of vertices I gave you earlier as triangles, starting with item 0 in the array and going up to the numItemsth element”.

Once this is done, WebGL will have drawn our triangle.   Next step, draw the square:

    mat4.translate(mvMatrix, [3.0, 0.0, 0.0]);

We start by moving our model-view matrix three units to the right.  Remember, we’re currently already 1.5 to the left and 7 away from the screen, so this leaves us 1.5 to the right and 7 away.  Next:

    gl.bindBuffer(gl.ARRAY_BUFFER, squareVertexPositionBuffer);
    gl.vertexAttribPointer(shaderProgram.vertexPositionAttribute, squareVertexPositionBuffer.itemSize, gl.FLOAT, false, 0, 0);

So, we tell WebGL to use our square’s buffer for its vertex positions…


…we push over the model-view and projection matrices again (so that we take account of that last mvTranslate), which means that we can finally:

    gl.drawArrays(gl.TRIANGLE_STRIP, 0, squareVertexPositionBuffer.numItems);

Draw the points.  What, you may ask, is a triangle strip?  Well, it’s a strip of triangles :-)   More usefully, it’s a strip of triangles where the first three vertices you give specify the first triangle, then the last two of those vertices plus the next one specify the next triangle, and so on.  In this case, it’s a quick-and-dirty way of specifying a square.  In more complex cases, it can be a really useful way of specifying a complex surface in terms of the triangles that approximate it.

Anyway, once that’s done, we’ve finished our drawScene function.


If you’ve got this far, you’re definitely ready to start experimenting.  Copy the code to a local file, either from GitHub or directly from the live version; if you do the latter, you need index.html and glMatrix-0.9.5.min.js. Run it up locally to make sure it works, then try changing some of the vertex positions above; in particular, the scene right now is pretty flat; try changing the Z values for the square to 2, or -3, and see it get larger or smaller as it moves back and forward.  Or try changing just one or two of them, and watch it distort in perspective.  Go crazy, and don’t mind me.  I’ll wait.

Right, now that you’re back, let’s take a look at the support functions that made all of the code we just went over possible. As I said before, if you’re happy to ignore the details and just copy and paste the support functions that come above initBuffers in the page, you can probably get away with it and build interesting WebGL pages (albeit in black and white — colour’s the next lesson).  But none of the details are difficult to understand, and by understanding how this stuff works you’re likely to write better WebGL code later on.

Still with me?  Thanks :-)   Let’s get the most boring of the functions out of the way first; the first one called by webGLStart, which is initGL.  It’s near the top of the web page, and here’s a copy for reference:

  var gl;
  function initGL(canvas) {
    try {
      gl = canvas.getContext("experimental-webgl");
      gl.viewportWidth = canvas.width;
      gl.viewportHeight = canvas.height;
    } catch(e) {
    if (!gl) {
      alert("Could not initialise WebGL, sorry :-( ");

This is very simple.  As you may have noticed, the initBuffers and drawScene functions frequently referred to an object called gl, which clearly referred to some kind of core WebGL “thing”.  This function gets that “thing”, which is called a WebGL context, and does it by asking the canvas it is given for the context, using a standard context name.  (As you can probably guess, at some point the context name will change from “experimental-webgl” to “webgl”; I’ll update this lesson and blog about it when that happens. Subscribe to the RSS feed if you want to know about that — and, indeed, if you want at-least-weekly WebGL news.) Once we’ve got the context, we again use JavaScript’s willingness to allow us to set any property we like on any object to store on it the width and height of the canvas to which it relates; this is so that we can use it in the code that sets up the viewport and the perspective at the start of drawScene. Once that’s done, our GL context is set up.

After calling initGL, webGLStart called initShaders. This, of course, initialises the shaders (duh ;-) .  We’ll come back to that one later, because first we should take a look at our model-view matrix, and the projection matrix I also mentioned earlier.  Here’s the code:

  var mvMatrix = mat4.create();
  var pMatrix = mat4.create();

So, we define a variable called mvMatrix to hold the model-view matrix and one called pMatrix for the projection matrix, and then set them to empty (all-zero) matrices to start off with. It’s worth saying a bit more about the projection matrix here. As you will remember, we applied the glMatrix function mat4.perspective to this variable to set up our perspective, right at the start of drawScene. This was because WebGL does not directly support perspective, just like it doesn’t directly support a model-view matrix.  But just like the process of moving things around and rotating them that is encapsulated in the model-view matrix, the process of making things that are far away look proportionally smaller than things close up is the kind of thing that matrices are really good at representing.  And, as you’ve doubtless guessed by now, the projection matrix is the one that does just that.  The mat4.perspective function, with its aspect ratio and field-of-view, populated the matrix with the values that gave use the kind of perspective we wanted.

Right, now we’ve been through everything apart from the setMatrixUniforms function, which, as I said earlier, moves the model-view and projection matrices up from JavaScript to WebGL, and the scary shader-related stuff.  They’re inter-related, so let’s start with some background.

Now, what is a shader, you may ask?  Well, at some point in the history of 3D graphics they may well have been what they sound like they might be — bits of code that tell the system how to shade, or colour, parts of a scene before it is drawn.  However, over time they have grown in scope, to the extent that they can now be better defined as bits of code that can do absolutely anything they want to bits of the scene before it’s drawn.  And this is actually pretty useful, because (a) they run on the graphics card, so they do what they do really quickly and (b) the kind of transformations they can do can be really convenient even in simple examples like this.

The reason that we’re introducing shaders in what is meant to be a simple WebGL example (they’re at least “intermediate” in OpenGL tutorials) is that we use them to get the WebGL system, hopefully running on the graphics card, to apply our model-view matrix and our projection matrix to our scene without us having to move around every point and every vertex in (relatively) slow JavaScript.   This is incredibly useful, and worth the extra overhead.

So, here’s how they are set up.  As you will remember, webGLStart called initShaders, so let’s go through that step-by-step:

  var shaderProgram;
  function initShaders() {
    var fragmentShader = getShader(gl, "shader-fs");
    var vertexShader = getShader(gl, "shader-vs");

    shaderProgram = gl.createProgram();
    gl.attachShader(shaderProgram, vertexShader);
    gl.attachShader(shaderProgram, fragmentShader);

    if (!gl.getProgramParameter(shaderProgram, gl.LINK_STATUS)) {
      alert("Could not initialise shaders");


As you can see, it uses a function called getShader to get two things,  a “fragment shader” and a “vertex shader”, and then attaches them both to a WebGL thing called a “program”.  A program is a bit of code that lives on the WebGL side of the system; you can look at it as a way of specifying something that can run on the graphics card.  As you would expect, you can associate with it a number of shaders, each of which you can see as a snippet of code within that program; specifically, each program can hold one fragment and one vertex shader. We’ll look at them shortly.

    shaderProgram.vertexPositionAttribute = gl.getAttribLocation(shaderProgram, "aVertexPosition");

Once the function has set up the program and attached the shaders, it gets a reference to an “attribute”, which it stores in a new field on the program object called vertexPositionAttribute. Once again we’re taking advantage of JavaScript’s willingness to set any field on any object; program objects don’t have a vertexPositionAttribute field by default, but it’s convenient for us to keep the two values together, so we just make the attribute a new field of the program.

So, what’s the vertexPositionAttribute for? As you may remember, we used it in drawScene; if you look now back at the code that set the triangle’s vertex positions from the appropriate buffer, you’ll see that the stuff we did associated the buffer with that attribute. You’ll see what that means in a moment; for now, let’s just note that we also use gl.enableVertexAttribArray to tell WebGL that we will want to provide values for the attribute using an array.

    shaderProgram.pMatrixUniform = gl.getUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "uPMatrix");
    shaderProgram.mvMatrixUniform = gl.getUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "uMVMatrix");

The last thing initShaders does is get two more values from the program, the locations of two things called uniform variables. We’ll encounter them soon; for now, you should just note that like the attribute, we store them on the program object for convenience.

Now, let’s take a look at getShader:

  function getShader(gl, id) {
      var shaderScript = document.getElementById(id);
      if (!shaderScript) {
          return null;

      var str = "";
      var k = shaderScript.firstChild;
      while (k) {
          if (k.nodeType == 3)
              str += k.textContent;
          k = k.nextSibling;

      var shader;
      if (shaderScript.type == "x-shader/x-fragment") {
          shader = gl.createShader(gl.FRAGMENT_SHADER);
      } else if (shaderScript.type == "x-shader/x-vertex") {
          shader = gl.createShader(gl.VERTEX_SHADER);
      } else {
          return null;

      gl.shaderSource(shader, str);

      if (!gl.getShaderParameter(shader, gl.COMPILE_STATUS)) {
          return null;

      return shader;

This is another one of those functions that is much simpler than it looks.  All we’re doing here is looking for an element in our HTML page that has an ID that matches a parameter passed in, pulling out its contents, creating either a fragment or a vertex shader based on its type (more about the difference between those in a future lesson) and then passing it off to WebGL to be compiled into a form that can run on the graphics card.  The code then handles any errors, and it’s done! Of course, we could just define shaders as strings within our JavaScript code and not mess around with extracting them from the HTML — but by doing it this way, we make them much easier to read, because they are defined as scripts in the web page, just as if they were JavaScript themselves.

Having seen this, we should take a look at the shaders’ code: 

<script id="shader-fs" type="x-shader/x-fragment">
  precision mediump float;

  void main(void) {
    gl_FragColor = vec4(1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0);

<script id="shader-vs" type="x-shader/x-vertex">
  attribute vec3 aVertexPosition;

  uniform mat4 uMVMatrix;
  uniform mat4 uPMatrix;

  void main(void) {
    gl_Position = uPMatrix * uMVMatrix * vec4(aVertexPosition, 1.0);

The first thing to remember about these is that they are not written in JavaScript, even though the ancestry of the language is clearly similar.  In fact, they’re written in a special shader language — called GLSL — that owes a lot to C (as, of course, does JavaScript). 

The first of the two, the fragment shader, does pretty much nothing; it has a bit of obligatory boilerplate code to tell the graphics card how precise we want it to be with floating-point numbers (medium precision is good because it’s required to be supported by all WebGL devices — highp for high precision doesn’t work on all mobile devices), then simply specifies that everything that is drawn will be drawn in white.  (How to do stuff in colour is the subject of the next lesson.)

The second shader is a little more interesting.   It’s a vertex shader — which, you’ll remember, means that it’s a bit of graphics-card code that can do pretty much anything it wants with a vertex.  Associated with it, it has two uniform variables called uMVMatrix and uPMatrix.  Uniform variables are useful because they can be accessed from outside the shader — indeed, from outside its containing program, as you can probably remember from when we extracted their location in initShaders, and from the code we’ll look at next, where (as I’m sure you’ve realised) we set them to the values of the model-view and the projection matrices.  You might want to think of the shader’s program as an object (in the object-oriented sense) and the uniform variables as fields. 

Now, the shader is called for every vertex, and the vertex is passed in to the shader code as aVertexPosition, thanks to the use of the vertexPositionAttribute in the drawScene, when we associated the attribute with the buffer.  The tiny bit of code in the shader’s main routine just multiplies the vertex’s position by the model-view and the projection matrices, and pushes out the result as the final position of the vertex.

So, webGLStart called initShaders, which used getShader to load the fragment and the vertex shaders from scripts in the web page, so that they could be compiled and passed over to WebGL and used later when rendering our 3D scene.

After all that, the only remaining unexplained code is setMatrixUniforms, which is easy to understand once you know everything above :-)

  function setMatrixUniforms() {
    gl.uniformMatrix4fv(shaderProgram.pMatrixUniform, false, pMatrix);
    gl.uniformMatrix4fv(shaderProgram.mvMatrixUniform, false, mvMatrix);

So, using the references to the uniforms that represent our projection matrix and our model-view matrix that we got back in initShaders, we send WebGL the values from our JavaScript-style matrices.

Phew!  That was quite a lot for a first lesson, but hopefully now you (and I) understand all of the groundwork we’re going to need to start building something more interesting — colourful, moving, properly three-dimensional WebGL models. To find out more, read on for lesson 2.

<< Lesson 0Lesson 2 >>

Acknowledgments: obviously I’m deeply in debt to NeHe for his OpenGL tutorial for the script for this lesson, but I’d also like to thank Benjamin DeLillo and Vladimir Vukićević for their WebGL sample code, which I’ve investigated, analysed, probably completely misunderstood, and eventually munged together into the code on which I based this post :-) . Thanks also to Brandon Jones for glMatrix. Finally, thanks to James Coglan, who wrote the general-purpose Sylvester matrix library; the first versions of this lesson used it instead of the much more WebGL-centric glMatrix, so the current version would never have existed without it.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

289 Responses to “WebGL Lesson 1 – A triangle and a square”

  1. andre says:

    awesome. thank you much

  2. F1LT3R says:

    Thanks for sharing, great article! Looking forward to digging into more complex vertex shaders.

  3. raghavender says:

    how can i learn webgl is it necessary to download any software version for webgl .how can i embeed webgl with the html what are different modules in webgl.which is the finest way to approch the webgl

  4. George Slavov says:

    What are some techniques for loading more complicated models and objects int the GL scene? It seems all the demos of WebGL so far just store the vertex data in javascript arrays or somesuch, but if it were a more complex model, that would be kinda annoying.

  5. giles says:

    @andre, @F1LT3R — thanks! I’m working on lesson 2 (adding colour) right now, and I think will work my way through NeHe up to #10 before branching out. That said, the Puls demo at http://wakaba.c3.cx/w/puls.html does tempt me to do a more detailed out-of-sequence look at vertex shaders…

    @raghavender Um, just read this page from the start to the end :-)

    @George Slavov Check out Vladimir Vukićević’s Spore Creature View at http://people.mozilla.com/~vladimir/webgl/spore/sporeview.html — it loads up the creature from a COLLADA file using a file parser he wrote himself.

  6. Dag Ågren says:

    I seem to recall that the WebKit WebGL demos had a simple implementation of a Wavefront .obj loader for loading objects. It’s an easy format to load since it’s all simple ASCII. Those demos live somewhere inside the WebKit source tree, I forget where exactly. Some googling might help.

  7. giles says:

    @Dag Ågren Thanks! I think that sometime later on I need to do a lesson showing how to load stuff from, say, Blender, and .obj is probably the best export format for that.

  8. Ray says:

    Does it work on your Browser ?

    It doesn’t work on mine.

    Firefox 3.7a1pre. winxp sp3.

    Turn on webgl.enable_for_all_sites, and html5.enable.

    Looking forward for your help.


  9. giles says:


    Thanks for telling me. I see from your comments on the Mandelbrot example that you’re using the most up-to-date driver that you can get, but could you let me know whether the demo works when you use software rendering? Vladimir Vukićević describes how to enable it in his post at http://blog.vlad1.com/2009/09/21/webgl-samples/, in the paragraph starting “For those of you on Windows”.



  10. Ray says:

    I have tried Software Rendering.
    Is it turn on the tag of webgl.software_render ?


    A good news is your lesson demo works on my laptop.

    Benq S73-C40.
    T2050, 2G Ram, ATI x1600 mobile.

    thanks for your help~

    I will try most up-to-date driver on my desktop computer.

  11. Ray says:

    I just forget the result of software rendering. It seems failed.

  12. giles says:


    Yes, webgl.software_render is the right config flag for software rendering. Sorry to hear that the demo didn’t work on your desktop even with that switched on, but it’s good to hear you have it working on the laptop! I’d be very interested in knowing what you see once you’ve updated the desktop’s drivers.

    I get the impression that there will be quite a few hardware compatibility issues to sort out before the Mozilla and WebKit teams can release WebGL properly….



  13. Ray says:

    Good news.
    After updating the desktop graphics card driver to 8.583.0.0 , 2/11/2009.
    Your Demo works.

  14. Ray says:


    I wonder that is it possible to use webgl without shaders ?

  15. giles says:

    Ray — many thanks for letting me know that updating the driver fixed the problem. I should do a “troubleshooting” post…

    Re: shaders — the short answer is no, it’s not possible to use WebGL without them. You always have to write your own in OpenGL ES (the version of OpenGL on which WebGL is based) and from what I’ve read elsewhere, it sounds like WebGL is going to be the same.

    On the one hand, it’s a pain because you have to learn relatively advanced stuff right at the start in this lesson. On the other hand, in order to write non-trivial 3D graphics you have to learn about shaders eventually, so perhaps there’s something to be said for learning about them early on.

    All that said, the OpenGL ES book I have does have a sample implementation of a shader that does roughly what OpenGL’s default shader does, so I might put that into a later lesson — need to check the copyright first, though.

  16. Petor says:

    great work! Thank you.

  17. Ray says:

    Thanks for your reply.

    And a little suggestion for you, it is the style of your site.
    Because I have been reading your articles for a whole afternoon,
    my eyes hurt.

    I guess, a while background and black letter will be better.

    Well, however, thanks for your great work!


  18. giles says:

    @Ray — I’m flattered that you found it worth reading my articles for a whole afternoon! I like the particular design on this site, but I appreciate that it might be hard to read for some people — perhaps I should do a poll to see what people prefer…

  19. Luan Almeida says:

    Thank you for the great post… your work is rly awesome!
    Can I ask ya to do comments on the codes? Would help a lot for me to learn those things… this whole WebGL thing looks a lot more weird/hard than I thought it was before I start.
    I do know javascript very well.. but I’m totaly noob about 3D stuff… =X

  20. giles says:

    Glad you like it! I guess you mean “//” type comments within the code? That’s a good idea, I’ll start doing that for the new lessons, from #7 onwards — not sure I’ll have the time to retro-fit them to the earlier ones though :-(

  21. Good site. I love it. But I have to say to you that probably this lesson (lesson 1) has some problem. Both on Linux with Firefox 3.7 and Windows with Chrome (29786) the app has memory leaks. In both systems when I open up the task manager the memory consumed little by little increases.

  22. giles says:

    Interesting! I saw an increase in memory usage of 15Mb over half an hour, 7Mb of which was recovered within a few minutes of closing the page. Is this in line with what you saw?

    [UPDATE] I’ve made some changes since this comment that I think fix the leak.

  23. Picky comment: your triangle is isoceles, but not equilateral. Your triangle has wir=dth and height both = 2. To be equilateral with its current width it would have height sqrt(3) – and you’d have to shift the base vertices up a tad to get the center at (0,0).

    Useful tutorial: thanks!

  24. giles says:

    Picky but true — thanks! I will fix it.

  25. jicks says:

    Why would they use a different shader language? why not solve all in Javascript? Fragmenting the gl programming in browser will just make it obsolete. Noone wants fragmentation anymore.

  26. giles says:

    jicks — the shader language has to be compiled to run on the graphics card, which although fast is not really capable of running dynamic languages like JavaScript — in fact, some are so primitive that they can’t even do conditional jumps back (which means that technically speaking they’re not proper computers).

    This may well change in the future. But for now we need to program shaders using a language that can be compiled down to the very simple machine code that graphics cards can understand.

  27. Lindsay says:

    Thanks for these tutorials, I’m finding them very useful.

    Do you by any chance know how to “release” all acquired WebGL context resources (buffers, programs etc.) in one hit, like a global reset? I’d like to make a playroom with an “eval” button, that inits WebGL each time…cheers

  28. xavi says:

    I, it works fine on your page, but if i download it (the 3 files) i just get a black window. i can change it to red (gl.clearColor(1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0); ) but i get nothing else…can you help me?

  29. giles says:

    @Lindsay — thanks! I’m afraid I don’t know of any call like that, have you looked through the spec? Here’s a link: https://cvs.khronos.org/svn/repos/registry/trunk/public/webgl/doc/spec/WebGL-spec.html

    @xavi — That sounds like something’s going wrong in the JavaScript. Have you looked at the error console? If you’re using Minefield, you’ll find it on the tools menu.

  30. ipprof says:

    Thank you for that interesting lesson! Everything is just simple

  31. giles says:

    @ipprof — glad you like it :-)

  32. KevinK says:

    With regard to the provenence of glUtil.js, I believe it was written by Vladimir Vukicevic. At least, his blog refers to it as a tool that he has written.

  33. giles says:

    Aha! Thanks, Kevin. I suspected it might be Vladimir’s, but I hadn’t seen the bit on his blog you refer to. I’ll attribute appropriately.

  34. [...] Start to Learn WebGL Now? WebGL Lesson [...]

  35. Orubel says:

    it was working great but then I updated webkit and now the box flickers.

  36. giles says:

    Odd! Which version does WebKit say it is?

  37. Passy says:

    Awesome work! This is the best resource for this topic I found so far.
    I still think that you’re using too much global state in the code. The code would be much more readable if you’d utilize more object-oriented patterns.

    Nervertheless, I can’t wait to read the remaining tutorials. Keep on your great work!

  38. sid3k says:

    Firstly, thank you for the great effort. But as I know, these NeHe tutorials aren’t known as good for newbies. The examples I tried to understand are full of sphagetti codes and not clean/readable. Also, tutorial doesn’t follow an order.

  39. giles says:

    @Passy — thanks! You’re right, there’s a lot of global state. But choosing an OO pattern would, I think, force people into paying more attention to the code design and less to the API. I may well be wrong, of course… anyway, I’m working on a larger-scale tutorial that will (hopefully) make it clear that non-trivial examples shouldn’t be using any global state. Lesson 9 also has a bit of a tutorial on using JS objects to represent stuff in the 3D world.

    @sid3k — unsurprisingly, I disagree :-) I’m not a huge fan of the coding style of the original NeHe tutorials, and they do use direct mode OpenGL (which is deprecated these days). But the first ten of them do follow a very logical path, introducing you to a bunch of really useful stuff. So my aim in these tutorials was to clean up the first ten, port them over to WebGL (which doesn’t have a direct mode), and then to move in a slightly different direction after that to introduce people to other stuff in further tutorials.

  40. Georgi Keremidchiev says:

    Hello, very very good lesson, thank you. Do you know units in canvas what metric is(px, inc, % of somthing)?


  41. giles says:

    Glad you like the lesson, Georgi. For the metric, I guess you mean for the width and height attributes — it’s pixels by default. You can use percentages by explicitly putting “%” after the number, but I’ve had problems with that — if I remember correctly, Minefield became unhappy when the window was resized.

  42. Georgi says:

    Hi, I mean in this:
    vertices = [
    1.0, 1.0, 0.0,
    -1.0, 1.0, 0.0,
    1.0, -1.0, 0.0,
    -1.0, -1.0, 0.0
    and in
    perspective(45, 1.0, 0.1, 100.0);
    In all lesson write units, but in fact what it is?

  43. Ken says:

    thanks very much for your tutorial.

    Maybe this is related to the post from Edward Boszczowski, but lesson 1 does not work with Chromium on my computer. The canvas is just black. All other lessons work fine and also, with Firefox lesson 1 works.

    Could think of what the problem might be?

  44. giles says:

    @Georgi — it’s whatever you want it to be. Think of it this way — something of (say) one unit in size that is at distance z might be ten pixels across, but the same object at distance 2z will be five pixels across because of perspective. We use non-specific units so that we have a uniform measurement of size.

    What that means in practice is that you can decide when planning a scene what you want a unit to represent. In the large-scale demo I’m writing called Spacelike (http://learningwebgl.com/spacelike/) I decided that one unit would be equivalent to a kilometer, so I made the Earth 6371 units in radius, the Sun 1392000 units, and placed them 149597887 units apart. I then added a spaceship of length 0.2 units, and placed it 18000 units from the Earth. Because all of the scales were consistent, it looked right.

    But if I’d been writing a first-person shooter like Quake, I might have decided to treat units as being meters — so 2-unit tall monsters might have coming shooting at the player from 100 units away.

    The point is, as long as everything in your model uses the same kind of units, it’ll all work out.

  45. giles says:

    @Ken — that’s very strange, I really don’t know. Could you give more information? In particular, knowing the operating system and graphics card could help.

  46. DisLike says:

    Hello. I tried using Minefield 3.7a5pre on my laptop (Dell Inspiron 6400) using Linux Kubuntu Karmic, but I couldn’t make WebGL work yet. It seems that my graphics card (integrated Intel graphics card) does not support OpenGL 2.1 or something.

    glxgears gives me this:
    OpenGL version string: 1.4 Mesa 7.7-devel

    The odd thing is that software rendering does not solve the problem :( I keep getting message box telling that WebGL could not be initialized.

    Has anyone succeeded in making software rendering work?

  47. Georgi says:

    giles thank you for the comprehensive answer :)

  48. giles says:

    @Georgi — you’re welcome :-)

    @DisLike — it looks like a lot of people are having problems with Linux at the moment, perhaps a recent build broke something? Here’s a thread on the Khronos forums that you might be able to add to, though it doesn’t look like anyone has any solutions yet. http://www.khronos.org/message_boards/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=2695

  49. tuni says:

    Are OPENGL & webgl both same???are their syntax same? if anyone is familiar with opengl but not with web application,is it quite similar

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow Learning WebGL on Twitter